As I start to work with Admin on finding a league to merge us with, I need to know what league rules are most important to you guys, so I can try to find the best fit for a merge. Can you please let me know which of these settings you consider vital, very important, somewhat important, or not important to you?
1. 6 games per day
2. Your home city
3. Minor league system (15 -> 1 CPs)
4. Injury system (if it's important to you, would be you more upset by more or by less injuries?)
5. Development curve system (not having variable improvement)
6. Attribute display (showing letters and +/-)
I think that covers what I would consider the "major" rules, but if there's anything else that matters a good deal to you, please mention that as well. Understand that we likely won't be able to keep everything the same if we merge, but this will help me prioritize things.
Thanks,
Mark/Montreal
Priorities for a merge
Re: Priorities for a merge
6 games per day - important
Home city - not important
Minor league system - somewhat important (prefer either system 2 or 5
Injury system - somewhat important
Development curve system - important (prefer 0)
Attribute display - important (prefer letters)
Home city - not important
Minor league system - somewhat important (prefer either system 2 or 5
Injury system - somewhat important
Development curve system - important (prefer 0)
Attribute display - important (prefer letters)
Re: Priorities for a merge
Thanks for the follow-up; my preferences listed below...
6 games per day - important (3 or 6 games/day; prefer not more)
Home city - not important (if can maintain current great but flexible)
Minor league system - somewhat important (prefer either system 2 or 5); prefer system 5 if possible
Injury system - somewhat important
Development curve system - important (prefer 0)
Attribute display - important (prefer letters)
Thanks,
Ted - Texas Wranglers
6 games per day - important (3 or 6 games/day; prefer not more)
Home city - not important (if can maintain current great but flexible)
Minor league system - somewhat important (prefer either system 2 or 5); prefer system 5 if possible
Injury system - somewhat important
Development curve system - important (prefer 0)
Attribute display - important (prefer letters)
Thanks,
Ted - Texas Wranglers
Re: Priorities for a merge per ACK
Thanks in advance for taking the time to persevere ...
For Arizona, we consider --
6 gpd -- Very Important
Home City -- Not Important
Minor Leagues -- Very Important to maintain current system
Injury -- Somewhat (like it matters to ABE ?!)
Development -- Somewhat
Attributes -- Not Important (i like stats, numbers actually)
For Arizona, we consider --
6 gpd -- Very Important
Home City -- Not Important
Minor Leagues -- Very Important to maintain current system
Injury -- Somewhat (like it matters to ABE ?!)
Development -- Somewhat
Attributes -- Not Important (i like stats, numbers actually)
-
- Posts: 528
- Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2017 5:51 am
- Location: Athens Ohio
Re: Priorities for a merge
Brooklyn
System 1-15 or system 3
anything else is fine
System 1-15 or system 3
anything else is fine