development curve

Ask for or give help with trade offers, coach point distribution, draftee rankings, or anything else specific to team strategy.
phen0m
Posts: 308
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2017 11:45 am

Re: development curve

Post by phen0m » Sat Feb 15, 2020 7:40 am

tworoosters wrote:
Fri Feb 14, 2020 9:17 pm
apparently pitchers who start as OS19 C+ overall and average 9% improves aren't busts,apparently pitchers who have never had an improvement percent as high as 13% in any year aren't busts.
They aren't.

WillyD
Posts: 1976
Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2017 12:29 pm
Location: New England

Re: development curve

Post by WillyD » Sat Feb 15, 2020 11:14 am

tworoosters wrote:
Fri Feb 14, 2020 9:17 pm
MDorf wrote:
Thu Feb 13, 2020 11:16 pm
Every bust I've seen has gone 0 for most years and 1 or 2 improves at most. I'm pretty sure he's not a bust. He's just a huge disappointment.
that's not actually a curve, I would requote the rule book but why bother, apparently pitchers who start as OS19 C+ overall and average 9% improves aren't busts,apparently pitchers who have never had an improvement percent as high as 13% in any year aren't busts.

I change my mind, he's the new "huge disappointment curve. Lave him in the minors a few more years
All of this opinion is based on what? Your extensive experience in variable development?

I've seen pitchers that were huge disappointments before, but I've never seen a bust have even one decent improvement season. There's nothing about different types of busts in the game guide. It does however mention three types of Enigmas and Eurekas. I'll stand by my prediction he's a Eureka, but a regular curve disappointment is far mrs likely than a bust.

Or maybe he's the new "super lucky bust curve?"

Post Reply

Return to “Baseball Team, Draft and Trade Help”